Study on inducing mechanism of construction workers' risk-taking behavior by noise

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.003

Abstract

Abstract: In order to reveal mechanism of risk-taking behavior induced by construction noise so as to improve safety performance, a psychological mechanism model of it was established based on maximum adaptability and risk-as-feelings theories. Then, brain nerve experiments were conducted by utilizing ERP technique, and behavioral changes and psychological characteristics of construction workers under different sound conditions were studied. The results show that noise can affect information perception and processing. Compared with cases of quiet environment, high level construction noise induces greater amplitude of P2, P3 and LPP components, which promotes self-depletion and reward-seeking tendency, resulting in longer response time for behavioral decision-making and an increase of risk-taking behavior.

Key words: inducing noise, construction worker, risk-taking behavior, causation mechanism, event-related potential (ERP), cranial nerve experiment

CLC Number:

X911

YE Gui, CHEN Liying, FENG Xinyi, YANG Jingjing, YUE Hongzhe. Study on inducing mechanism of construction workers' risk-taking behavior by noise[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12): 16-23.

References

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.住房和城乡建设部办公厅关于2019年房屋市政工程生产安全事故情况的通报 [EB/OL].[2020-06-19]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/202006/t20200624_246031.html.
[2] 贾明涛.行为安全管理在施工中的应用分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7): 169-173.
JIA Mingtao. Application analysis of behavior-based safety management in construction[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(7): 169-173.
[3] MAN S S,CHAN A H S,WONG H M. Risk-taking behaviors of Hong Kong construction workers-a thematic study[J]. Safety Science, 2017,98(5): 25-36.
[4] SYNDICUS M, WIESE B S, TREECK C V. In the heat and noise of the moment: effects on risky decision making[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2018,50(1): 3-27.
[5] BASNER M, BABISCH W, DAVIS A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health[J]. The Lancet, 2014, 383(9925): 1 325-1 332.
[6] LEE S C, HONG J Y, JEON J Y. Effects of acoustic characteristics of combined construction noise on annoyance[J]. Building & Environment, 2015, 92(5): 657-667.
[7] SAZLMA J L, HCOCK P A. Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(4): 682-707.
[8] LU Xueqing, DAVIS S. How sounds influence user safety decisions in a virtual construction simulator[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 86(2): 184-194.
[9] ROBERTS K R, DIMSDALE J, EAST P, et al. Adolescent emotional response to music and its relationship to risk-taking behaviors[J]. Journal of Adolescent Health, 1998, 23(1): 49-54.
[10] BRODSKY W. The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control[J]. Transportation Research Part F Psychology & Behaviour, 2001, 4(4): 219-241.
[11] HALKO M L, KAUSTIA M. Risk on / risk off: risk-taking varies with subjectively preferred and disliked music[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(8): 1-16.
[12] 叶贵,越宏哲,杨晶晶,等.建筑工人认知水平对不安全行为影响仿真研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(9): 36-42.
YE Gui, YUE Hongzhe, YANG Jingjing, et al. Simulation study on influences of construction workers' bounded rational cognition on unsafe behaviors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(9): 36-42.
[13] 张殿业,程静,张艺.情绪对驾驶行为影响研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(10): 19-24.
ZHANG Dianye, CHENG Jing, ZHANG Yi. Influences of emotions on driving behaviors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018,28(10): 19-24.
[14] LOEWENSTEIN G F, WEBER E U, HSEE C K, et al. Risk as feelings[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2001,127(2): 267-286.
[15] HANCOCK P A, WARM J S. A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention[J]. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,1989,31(5): 519-537.
[16] GBZ2.2—2007,工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素[S].
GBZ2.2-2007, Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace Physical agents[S].
[17] 韩伟伟,王晶.产品设计与性能冲突对消费者决策过程的神经学影响[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(2): 155-168.
HAN Weiwei, WANG Jing. Neurological impact of the conflict between product design and performance on consumer decision process [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017,20(2): 155-168.
[18] CLAYSON P E, LARSON M J. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2011, 49(7): 1 953-1 961.
[19] 付艺蕾,罗跃嘉,崔芳.选择一致性影响结果评价的ERP研究[J].心理学报,2017,49(8): 1 089-1 099.
FU Yilei, LUO Yuejia, CUI Fang. Consistency of choice modulates outcome evaluation: Evidence from ERP studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017,49(8): 1 089-1 099.
[20] LIU Tao, LIN Chichiuan C, HUANG Kuochen, et al. Effects of noise type, noise intensity, and illumination intensity on reading performance[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2017, 120(1): 70-74.
[21] HOCKEY G R. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework[J]. Biological Psychology, 1997, 45(1/2/3): 73-93.
[22] PECHMANN, CORNELIA. A comparison of health communication models: risk learning versus stereotype priming[J]. Media Psychology, 2001, 3(2): 189-210.
[23] 窦凯,聂衍刚,王玉洁,等.自我损耗促进冲动决策:来自行为和ERPs的证据[J].心理学报,2014,46(10): 1 564-1 579.
DOU Kai, NIE Yangang, WANG Yujie, et al. Ego depletion promotes impulsive decision: evidences from behavioral and ERPs studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014,46(10): 1 564-1 579.